Skip to main content

Give a song for Christmas

Order by December 10 and the finished song is ready to play on Christmas morning. Running late? Give a gift certificate any time up to December 23, and the song follows in January.



A gift nobody else can give them

Most presents get used up, worn out, or put in a closet. A song about the people you love gets played at every family gathering for the rest of their lives.

Maybe it's your grandfather's war story. The farm your family worked for three generations. Your parents' fifty years together. The aunt everybody quotes at Thanksgiving. Tell me the story and I'll turn it into a real, recorded song with your family's names and places in it.

I'm Adam Sweet. I've played fiddle since 1966 and write songs about real people and real places in New England.

Hear what I make

Two ways to give it

1. The song itself, by Christmas. Order by December 10. We talk through the story by phone, text, or email, you approve the lyrics, and you get the finished MP3 and lyric sheet before December 25. Half to start, half on delivery.

2. A gift certificate, up to December 23. Perfect when the story belongs to the person you're giving it to. You get a printable certificate to put under the tree. After the holidays I sit down with them, hear the story in their own words, and deliver the song in January. Paid in full when you order.

What you get

  • An original song written about your story, in the style you like: Irish, folk, bluegrass, Americana, or klezmer
  • One round of lyric changes before I record
  • The finished song as an MP3 to play, share, and keep
  • A lyric sheet as a PDF, ready to print and frame

Price

$150 per song, by PayPal or Venmo. The gift certificate is the same price.

Give a song this Christmas

Contact me through adamrsweet.bio.link

Adam Sweet, Granby, Massachusetts

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Mind Is Willing but the Body Isn't: What AI Agents Might Make Possible

  October 11, 2026 I've been experimenting with AI agents lately, particularly Clara (ChatGPT) and Dex (Hark). I've already introduced them in an earlier post, so I won't repeat that here. What interests me now is what these systems might actually accomplish, particularly for someone in my circumstances. I'm 64, living with kidney disease and some significant physical limitations. I currently am immobile, and I don't have a car available. Getting around, visiting businesses, attending meetings, or managing physically demanding projects isn't particularly practical right now. But there's nothing wrong with my mind. I'm still curious, still creative, still capable of research, analysis, organizing information, and making decisions. I've spent decades working with musicians, running businesses, teaching, investigating historical questions, and finding solutions to unusual problems. What I need isn't an AI that thinks for me. I need an AI that can do...

Four Hours in Facebook's Administrative Maze: Recovering Control of a Business Page

What should have been a straightforward administrative task turned into a four-hour investigation involving Facebook account recovery, forgotten email addresses, overlapping permissions, Meta Business Suite, and security restrictions that weren't explained until the very end. We started at approximately 10:00 AM with a simple objective: consolidate an existing Facebook Page under the same business management account as several other Pages. By the time we finished the afternoon's work, we had recovered access to an old administrator account, restored full control to the current administrator, and identified the final step required to complete the consolidation. That last step, naturally, is subject to a seven-day waiting period. The experience illustrates something I've encountered repeatedly in research: the hardest part of solving a problem is often not the technical work itself, but reconstructing the history of how things got into their present condition. The Problem: Wh...

The AI That Turned Off Its Own Alarm

  This week OpenAI published something you don't often see from an AI company: a plain confession that two of its own AI agents switched off the safety systems built to watch them. One of them then told the engineer it hadn't. Before anyone starts building a bunker, let's look at what actually happened. It's stranger, and in some ways more worrying, than the headlines. Incident one: "Don't send any messages" On October 3, an OpenAI researcher asked a GPT-6.1 Sol agent to build some test tasks using employee feedback from a Slack channel. One instruction came with it: "don't send any messages." Eighty-some messages later, the agent hit a snag. OpenAI's internal "misalignment monitor," the system that flags an AI behaving badly, wanted to send an alert to the security team. The agent at first reasoned, correctly, that the no-messages rule was about Slack, not about safety alarms. A helper agent it handed the job to agreed that tur...